From his promise to boost up troops in Afghanistan so they and we can win in the fight against terror, President Obama is backing down. He's breaking his Afghanistan promise, just as he's broken so many.
Questions to ask:
Is he waffling because the key Democrats in Congress don't want more troops sent there to win the war and refuse to finance them?
Does he have an underlying purpose...weaken our leadership abroad and allow terrorists to gain hold so they can attack our country again?
Is he planning to hand our country over to terrorists...with him in control of a socialist country? Does he have a secret deal in the works?
Showing posts with label terrorists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorists. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Is Obama Making Our Country More Susceptible for Terrorists?
Is Obama in the process of setting our country up for terrorist susceptibility? The feelers have been going out about limiting citizens' right right to bear arms. If you get enough feelers going out, frequently enough, you begin to desensitize people and encourage the activists.
However, since that strategy might not be fast enough for Obama and crew, are they focusing on the airline pilots? For it seems a good possibility that the right to bear arms and protect their passengers from 9/11 type attacks is being yanked from the pilots...quietly and, until now, without notice.
Is Obama disarming the pilots to ecourage terrorist attacks?
Some resistance and dissatisfaction with his recent policies is surfacing. Are militant takeover plans the backup if Obama can't get his way through legislation and executive orders fast enough?
Think about it. Why disarm the pilots and put planes and passengers in jeopardy unless there's an underlying reason.
(Since the above linked article appeared, denials have been made by Obama's spokespeople . But something set off the story in the first place. It's unlikely that the news came out of thin air. What do you think?)
However, since that strategy might not be fast enough for Obama and crew, are they focusing on the airline pilots? For it seems a good possibility that the right to bear arms and protect their passengers from 9/11 type attacks is being yanked from the pilots...quietly and, until now, without notice.
Is Obama disarming the pilots to ecourage terrorist attacks?
Some resistance and dissatisfaction with his recent policies is surfacing. Are militant takeover plans the backup if Obama can't get his way through legislation and executive orders fast enough?
Think about it. Why disarm the pilots and put planes and passengers in jeopardy unless there's an underlying reason.
(Since the above linked article appeared, denials have been made by Obama's spokespeople . But something set off the story in the first place. It's unlikely that the news came out of thin air. What do you think?)
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Is Barack Hussein Obama Unleashing Terrorists on Our Country?
Would a President, who had the safety and welfare of his country in mind, release known terrorists unless he had an underlying motive? Why is Barack Hussein Obama releasing them, by executive order, from Gitmo, like one recently sent to Britain, who has known terrorist ties?
Is there an underlying motive, not just the humanitarian ones he spouts to the public?
Is this just the beginning of a reign of terror to be unleashed on this country and the world while the terrorists take over? Are there plans in the works to set terrorists against America? Are there undergound terrorists in this country planning to join them?
Something to think about when America's enemies are being set free?
Is there an underlying motive, not just the humanitarian ones he spouts to the public?
Is this just the beginning of a reign of terror to be unleashed on this country and the world while the terrorists take over? Are there plans in the works to set terrorists against America? Are there undergound terrorists in this country planning to join them?
Something to think about when America's enemies are being set free?
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Is Obama Playing Games With Gitmo? And the American People?
Obama issued an Executive Order claiming he's going to shut down Gitmo, the prison for terrorists at Guantanamo. This has satisfied those who think we should be kind to terrorists, hold their hands, and tell them, "Be good boys. Don't do that again."
Now more figures and facts are coming to light that previously released terrorists have rejoined the ranks of the terrorist groups. One, known as Said Ali Al-Shihri, has been officially confirmed, by the Pentagon as a deputy commander of Al Qaeda in Yemen. He's also suspected of being involved this past September in a failed attack on the U.S. embassy in Yemen.
This raises some questions:
Now more figures and facts are coming to light that previously released terrorists have rejoined the ranks of the terrorist groups. One, known as Said Ali Al-Shihri, has been officially confirmed, by the Pentagon as a deputy commander of Al Qaeda in Yemen. He's also suspected of being involved this past September in a failed attack on the U.S. embassy in Yemen.
This raises some questions:
- Did Obama know about this and other released terrorists who rejoined their groups, before issuing his Executive Order. As such, he can renege on the date for release...drag it out so he is satisfying those who want Gitmo closed and those who stress the danger of dispersing the prisoners.
- If Obama wasn't briefed about these terrorists who rejoin and reemerge in terrorist groups (and this seems unlikely given his "presidential" demeanor before the Inauguration), will this give him a reason to delay the shut down, again trying to satisfy both sides?
- Will Obama go ahead and release known terrorists throughout the world and "let the cards fall where they will?" At present, not too many countries seem to want the terrorists, except their fellow terrorists.
- Does Obama plan to release known terrorists and is in league with terrorist groups who could strike our interests around the world and even our own country?
Labels:
Barack Obama,
executive orders,
Gitmo,
Guantanamo,
Obama,
Obama Alert,
terrorists
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Will Obama Get "Buddy-Buddy" With Terrorists?
Throughout his campaign, Obama has indicated a willingness to talk with terrorists, preferring negotiations to "carrying a big stick." Apparently he's already putting out feelers for negotiations with Hamas before he becomes President.
Does this show weakness on the part of the U.S. and its President?
Does this show an alliance with terrorist organizations, a "buddy-buddy" relationship, that would be to the detriment of our country?
Does diplomacy mean the type of "peace in my day" appeasement that led to World War II?
Will it result in terrorist organizations obediently falling into line?
Does this show naivety on the part of a leader?
Or...does it mean a secret alliance arrangement between terrorist organizations and a U.S. President with the public kept in the dark?
What do you think?
Does this show weakness on the part of the U.S. and its President?
Does this show an alliance with terrorist organizations, a "buddy-buddy" relationship, that would be to the detriment of our country?
Does diplomacy mean the type of "peace in my day" appeasement that led to World War II?
Will it result in terrorist organizations obediently falling into line?
Does this show naivety on the part of a leader?
Or...does it mean a secret alliance arrangement between terrorist organizations and a U.S. President with the public kept in the dark?
What do you think?
Labels:
appeasement,
Barack Obama,
diplomacy,
Hamas,
negotiations,
Obama,
Obama regime,
terrorists,
World War II
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
